What might be a problem caused by revising methods sections too much?

Revising methods sections excessively can indeed lead to a lack of clarity and confusion. When revisions are made frequently, there is a risk that the writing might become convoluted, with overly complex sentences or redundant information introduced, which can overwhelm readers. Clear communication is crucial in methods sections, as they provide essential information about how the study was conducted, enabling others to replicate the research. If clarity is compromised, it can hinder understanding and ultimately affect the credibility of the study.

On the other hand, while excessive detail can be problematic and may lead to lengthy publications, the primary concern with over-revising often centers on clarity and straightforwardness. In contrast, accuracy in representation and length issues are not inherently tied to the act of revising for clarity, but rather to the content and the rigor of the review process itself. Therefore, the risk of reducing clarity is a direct consequence of poorly executed revisions rather than simply the act of revising itself.